Welcome to the first of what will hopefully be a new feature on The Whig. Sunday Thinkin' will, as the title suggests, feature yours truly dwelling on whatever subject comes to mind. Sometimes long, sometimes short, these posts won't be overly formal and meant to be just ruminations on different subjects.
So, as the title suggests, this introductory post will be about how there should be an agency dedicated to fighting terrorism as opposed to a department which seems to be all over the place. Let's begin.
I've long held to the opinion that the creation of a Department of Homeland Security was a mistake. Obviously, in the wake of the 9/11 attacks and everything it seemed like a good idea at the time. But to me, it was a knee-jerk reaction and a mistake. Yes, we needed an entity whose sole focus was foiling terrorist plots bringing them to justice, but I just don't think we needed a cabinet-level department.
Also? Can we all be honest and agree that "Department of Homeland Security" sounds just a tad ominous and even sinister? It comes off akin to one of those sinister government agencies you find in dystopian novels.
Now don't get me wrong, I realize that DHS is full of people who are just trying to do their job and protect this great country of ours, but I don't see why it couldn't be done via a law enforcement agency in the Department of Justice. I mean, we have the DEA and the ATF which were created to handle specific areas of crime, so why not one that deals with terrorism? It could have been called the Bureau of Counter-Terrorism or some such. Hopefully the agents working for that agency wouldn't go overboard like Jack Bauer did on 24.
Am I right? Am I wrong? Maybe. I don't pretend to be a counter-terrorism expert and never will. I just see the DHS's creation to have been knee-jerking by an administration and congress caught flatfooted by a horrendous attack and needed a way to allay fears and give the public the impression that the government knew how to handle the situation.